BOOK THE LORD OF THE RINGS FOR
The Lord of the Rings. The Lord of the Rings is a timeless classic consisting of the three books; The Fellowship of the Ring, The Two Towers & The Return of the . The "Lord of the Rings" and "Hobbit" films came as what you could call the end of a decades-long process: The books percolated through. Find the complete The Lord of the Rings book series listed in order. Great deals on one book or all books in the series. Free US shipping on orders over $
|Language:||English, Spanish, Dutch|
|ePub File Size:||20.52 MB|
|PDF File Size:||13.44 MB|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Regsitration Required]|
The Lord of the Rings is an epic high fantasy novel written by English author and scholar J. R. R. Tolkien. The story began as a sequel to Tolkien's fantasy. The Lord of the Rings [J.R.R. Tolkien] on cittadelmonte.info *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. "An extraordinary work -- pure excitement." -- New York Times Book. The Lord of the Rings book. Read reviews from the world's largest community for readers. One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them, One Rin. .
The Lord of the Rings is an epic high fantasy novel written by English author and scholar J. The story began as a sequel to Tolkien's fantasy novel The Hobbit , but eventually developed into a much larger work. Written in stages between and , The Lord of the Rings is one of the best-selling novels ever written , with over million copies sold. The title of the novel refers to the story's main antagonist , the Dark Lord Sauron , [a] who had in an earlier age created the One Ring to rule the other Rings of Power as the ultimate weapon in his campaign to conquer and rule all of Middle-earth. From quiet beginnings in the Shire , a hobbit land not unlike the English countryside, the story ranges across Middle-earth, following the course of the War of the Ring through the eyes of its characters, not only the hobbits Frodo Baggins , Samwise "Sam" Gamgee , Meriadoc "Merry" Brandybuck and Peregrin "Pippin" Took , but also the hobbits' chief allies and travelling companions: The work was initially intended by Tolkien to be one volume of a two-volume set, the other to be The Silmarillion , but this idea was dismissed by his publisher. Structurally, the novel is divided internally into six books, two per volume, with several appendices of background material included at the end.
The Lord of the Rings : Boxed Set
Introducing someone to the books calls for a simplified list. The list starts with "The Hobbit" since it was published first and because its completion necessitated changes in the world Tolkien initially devised. Finishing "The Lord of The Rings" led to further changes which were eventually rolled into "The Silmarillion," even though that book is largely concerned with events that precede "The Hobbit" and "The Lord of the Rings" — and it was drafted before both novels were written.
The decades-long development of "The Silmarillion" had some to do with the commercial viability of the text, but it's also plainly more difficult to read without being introduced to many of its concepts by the far more digestible novels that were published before it. Let's put it this way: You'll know if you have the stomach for the heavy-duty world-building at work in "The Silmarillion" if you're still hungry for more after finishing up the earlier books on the list.
You might say this is a perfect encapsulation of how potent Tolkien's world-building practice was — after having devoted himself to creating Middle-earth for some time already, his newer ideas for smaller, more focused stories could all be supported and informed by the myths, legends, languages and peoples he had already invested in.
Tolkien was actually building backwards from the world that surrounded him. Middle-earth is supposed to be our Earth a long time ago, and Tolkien started drafting his grand mythopoeic origin story of our world over two decades before "The Hobbit" was published.
The tale of Bilbo Baggins started as a children's story with little-to-no connections back to his established lore, but in finishing the story for publication Tolkien brought the story into the fold of his "dominant construction," Middle-earth. Before making that canonical link and publishing "The Hobbit," Tolkien essentially spent years making what would have amounted to little more than a curious passion pursuit of a humble Oxford professor had his publisher contacts rejected his manuscripts.
The secret sauce to Tolkien's fiction, both in its literary and commercial appeals, is the depth and detail of the world he created. Getting to "The Hobbit" and "The Lord of the Rings" required that huge investment of time and energy on Tolkien's part, but a reader doesn't need to wade through all of that material to get the full impact.
If you've ever been dissuaded from dipping a toe into Tolkien's work because you thought you'd be expected to learn Elvish or know the entire history of the world before popping in on the residents of The Shire, worry not.
Tolkien's authorial genius and generosity are on full display in "The Hobbit" and "The Lord of the Rings" — it's the later, posthumously published texts that prove to be a little harder to engage with. If you only wanted to read one non-Middle-earth thing written by J.
Tolkien to understand the man, you could read "The Father Christmas Letters. He must have poured hours into the letters, each a combination of carefully crafted storytelling, extraordinary penmanship and colorful illustration. Seriously, take a peek at them — they demonstrate the same creativity and whimsy Tolkien brought to "The Hobbit" and "The Adventures of Tom Bombadil. Thousands of pages of Tolkien's work have been published posthumously under the care of his family, most notably by his third son, Christopher.
When J. Huge canonical contradictions presented themselves at every turn, largely because of the fact that the whole canon of Middle-earth changed as a result of finishing "The Lord of the Rings":. It was inevitable that "The Lord of the Rings" must alter "The Silmarillion," because having once been — as I have said — an enclosed myth, with a beginning and an end — it now has the vast extension.
And in "The Lord of the Rings" there are major figures who come out of the Elder Days, out of the primeval world of "The Silmarillion"; chief among them, Galadriel.
So a great deal of writing back would have to be done. But my father being who he was, this writing back would never be a simple thing because he — when Galadriel enters out of "The Lord of the Rings" into the world of the Elves in Valinor new stories begin.
A Film Portrait of J. Tolkien ". While many fans were excited to receive a finished version of "The Silmarillion" in , they did not spare it from criticism.
Setting the differences in style from "The Hobbit" and "The Lord of the Rings" aside, readers accused Christopher Tolkien of having invented too much of the book from whole cloth — a subject that's grown increasingly complex after more and more of J.
The effect of Christopher's editorial decisions are a thorny issue on the basis of constructing a sensible canon alone, but they're also demonstrative of issues that plague any fandom of significant size. With "The Silmarillion," Christopher faced the formidable task of presenting a version of his own father's unfinished work that both respected the source material and felt complete. If he had tried to release something like the volume "History of Middle-earth" in the seventies, he would've been skewered every which way by fans of his father's work and by a literary community that at the time was far less interested in legitimizing serious study of Tolkien's work.
In short, Christopher Tolkien was stuck picking between a number of unpleasant choices. He could present a version of "The Silmarillion" he personally deemed printable but that would never live up to expectations set by fans; hide the contents of his father's brilliant-yet-incomplete manuscripts from the world indefinitely; or release their unedited contents to an audience that, at the time, would be largely uninterested in wading through it all.
Christopher Tolkien made a tough choice that nonetheless resulted in more of his father's brilliant work reaching the public eye. Usually in books you only get full-on exciting or beautifully written. I think that this book is one of the only books I've ever read that combines both.
Also, this edition is beautiful. After you read it, I admit that it doesn't fit very well in the box again, but the covers are gorgeous - black with gloss illustrations and Elven script. It's really beautiful.
Astonishing offer! Although it's printed in year when I was born , this is still one of the best edition for this money on a market. Everyone who consider himself as a epic genre fan, this is pure essential! One of a kind, Lord Of The Rings is one of those books that track attention to each new generation, and undoubtedly it will be bestseller for years to come.
Tollkien deserved it. The Lord of the Rings is a classic. One of the most celebrated of Tolkien's many works, this 3 volume story is so good that is for all ages, if you like fantasy stories This black box edition is very refined for this amazing price.
The books are pocket size and feature some maps that help you through the story, making reading easier; also the covers are reproductions os ilustrations by Tolkien himself. A great book for a great price! Book ratings by Goodreads. Goodreads is the world's largest site for readers with over 50 million reviews. We're featuring millions of their reader ratings on our book pages to help you find your new favourite book.
Close X. Learn about new offers and get more deals by joining our newsletter. Sign up now. The point of literary criticism is always to lead us back to human thought and ideas, to looking at how we think and express ourselves. If a detail in a work cannot lead us back to ourselves, then it is no more than an arbitrary piece of chaff.
Anything which does not materially contribute to the story, characters, and artistry of a work can safely be left out. Tolkien's embarrassment of detail also produced a huge inflation in the acceptable length of fantasy books, leading to the meandering, unending series that fill bookstore shelves today.
My Fantasy Book Suggestions Feb 05, Luffy rated it it was amazing. The Fellowship of the Ring begins with the Shire and winds its way through the barren lands that lie on the way to Mordor. I tried to read this part of the book once, but DNF it then. Then I picked up the trilogy bound in one volume and went through it fairly steadily. I've read that Tolkien wasn't as original as first claimed.
Nevertheless Tolkien take on traditional myths was unique and groundbreaking. The Eddas, the Welsh my The Fellowship of the Ring begins with the Shire and winds its way through the barren lands that lie on the way to Mordor. The Eddas, the Welsh myths, and Norse myths all are the foundation for this great story.
This was a reread and was a satisfactory one because I wanted to reach my favorite parts. I looked forward to read Tom Bombadil's part again. Did it. Then the Rivendell parts, ditto. Slowly I wound my way, sometimes following Sam and Frodo, sometimes Aragorn.
Gandalf appears relatively scantily towards the third book. Five well deserved stars, indeed. View all 13 comments. Lord of the Rings I have read LotR many times over the years, in fact it is I think the book I have read the most in this world, which i suppose makes it my favourite book, albeit closely followed by half a dozen others shout if you want to know or take a gander at my favourites shelf. I have always enjoyed it, understatement, but for some reason this re-read is more special than ever.
I had almost forgotten how much was different from the films, and despite having read LotR once before since t Lord of the Rings I have read LotR many times over the years, in fact it is I think the book I have read the most in this world, which i suppose makes it my favourite book, albeit closely followed by half a dozen others shout if you want to know or take a gander at my favourites shelf.
I had almost forgotten how much was different from the films, and despite having read LotR once before since the films, I seem to be getting more from the book this time than ever before.
As anyone who actually reads my reviews will know, I very rarely need to use spoilers as I leave other people to read the book themselves, so you will find no or few spoilers in this review. The first book weaves an amazing tale with incredible characters in a well constructed world. The characters and situations make you smile, laugh and even cry as the journey begins, the Fellowship is put together and at the close of this book, so cruelly broken.
Having somehow forgotten the differences to the film, I thoroughly enjoyed the differences, especially Tom Bombardil and the river daughter, and surprisingly I enjoyed all the poems, some brought tears to my eyes, is it the first time I have really read them??
February brings Again I think the book well outshines the film although the people I see inhabiting the characters are those from the films. Suffice to say the story continues apace and one falls in love with the characters even more. One is there fighting alongside them or willing them on when the going gets tough. The poems and rhymes again were a revelation to me and made the story even more enchanting, enthralling and yes again emotional.
It is slightly unsettling to be sitting on one's sofa on a Wednesday afternoon, fire lit, surrounded by ones three cats, sipping from a giant mug of coffee and finding tears streaming down ones face as you attempt to read what has become of the valiant loyal Sam or how Gandalf was returned to Middle Earth as the leader of his order. Most unsettling, hmm is it age?? And now I must again wait until next month to start book 3, such willpower ha ha.
Again different to the film, but yet again immeasurably superior. I put "just" in my marking of 5 stars and I think it is only just a five star read. Nothing is really "wrong" with this book, it just isn't as good ad the previous 2 in my opinion. Yes the battles are more epic, the journeys are more dangerous, the stakes are even higher the safety of the the world and the finale in Mordor is unbelievably dramatic but for some reason, despite being truly emotional about many scenes, yes there were tears rolling down my face, I still felt it was for some reason just not quite as good.
That said it was still amazing writing, both tense and dramatic, with pure poetry scenes littered throughout the book Faramir and Eowyn in the House of Healing the decision by Arwen Evenstar to accept a mortal life with Aragon Sam's determination to get to the top of Mount Doom and enough cliffhangers to last a lifetime.
I think it reaffirms my view that the films are good, but the book is another level and just truly awesome. I look forward to both discovering even more in my next read and being reduced to an emotional wreck yet again.
View all 12 comments. Apr 23, Natalia Yaneva rated it it was amazing Shelves: So, Terry Pratchett read all night long and for the whole next day too. He read the novel for 26 hours with some small breaks, of course — the bladder of a year-old is not a water-skin after all. In the years to come he continued to reread the book each year. This is how it goes, brilliant minds resonate in accord. Then you step outside the hobbit hole and the limits of the known and you plunge into adventures — you had been yearning so much to lose those familiar faces for a while and see if some glorious song might be sung for you too.
After that though you slowly realize that you carry a truly heavy burden on your shoulders, that you have responsibilities and failure means too much, it means the world. And like in life there are glimpses of hope, but also precipitous collapses in pitch-dark depths, you are sometimes alone among the multitude and sometimes there is a friend to lend you a helping hand, and you put one foot in front of the other and keep going because you know that nobody is going to wage that battle for you.
There be wonders. Who can say where the road goes? Where the day flows? Only Time View all 16 comments. Sep 12, Evgeny rated it it was amazing Shelves: I decided to read a one-book edition of the classic, just the way it was written. I will however split my discussion between three parts of it. I need to mention that I will not bother hiding any spoilers as I have trouble believing any modern person living in civilized enough parts of the world to have internet access has not read this one or at least has not seen the movies — which for all their faults were decent, but I am not talking about that abomination called the movie version of The Hob I decided to read a one-book edition of the classic, just the way it was written.
I need to mention that I will not bother hiding any spoilers as I have trouble believing any modern person living in civilized enough parts of the world to have internet access has not read this one or at least has not seen the movies — which for all their faults were decent, but I am not talking about that abomination called the movie version of The Hobbit.
As I mentioned before I hope everybody and their brother are familiar with the plot, so the only purpose this description serves is pure amusement. My first time I read this I was quite young. The end of the book I will refer to this work as a book, not a trilogy gave me the worst book hangover I ever had before.
Much later on I saw the movies and reread it. I matured and became more bitter and cynical. My initial rating of 5 stars still stands. This is a classic of epic fantasy against which all other epic fantasy works were judged up until now and will be judged in the foreseeing future.
There is a reason countless carbon copies of this epic exist — of different quality. It is very much arguable whether it was different enough not to be called a blatant rip-off, but the next two parts of his trilogy were different enough.
What would happen if you replace Frodo with a biggest whining asshole you can think of and leave everything else intact: You would get Thomas Covenant series by Stephen R. Donaldson; it gets recommended a lot and for some reason nobody is bothered by its similarities to The Lord of the Rings. These two are just the best-known examples.
It would be very much unfair to call The Lord of the Rings the first work of fantasy. Lord Dunsany, Robert E. Howard, and others were writing what is considered fantasy today way before J.
To my complete surprise I found the book an easy read on my second time through. Even the dreaded endless poetry did not bother me too much and no, I did not skip over it. What follows is my criticism of some occasional flows in otherwise great classic epic fantasy book.
I will split it into three parts to keep some semblance of organization. The Fellowship of the Ring. I was very curious to discover that Tolkien uses goblins and orcs interchangeably. When this story was briefly retold in The Lord of the Rings, goblins became orcs. In modern fantasy these two races are very much distinct. I always imagine goblins to be green guys on a weak side, more like bothersome troublemakers while orcs are brutes with tusks and armed for a battle.
Initially it took Frodo a while to get his behind moving and a because of this a lot of people complain about slow start. I was one of the complainers during my first read, but I found I like the slow-moving beginning the second time around. You will get a big picture of pastoral life in Shire to fully appreciate what would be lost to darkness. Tom Bombadil gets my award for being the most pointless character ever to grace a work of fantasy.
This would be the only part where the movie did better than the original source: Add to this his annoying habit of speaking in bad poetry and my award is entirely justified.
What the heck happened to Radagast? He was supposed to be a great wizard equal to both Saruman and Gandalf, however after unwittingly sending the latter to a trap he disappeared without a trace. In my humble opinion this is still the best third of the whole book. The Two Towers. Please correct me if I am wrong, but I think Tolkien created the first fantasy trilogy if you consider his big book being split in three parts by the publisher.
In this case he was also the guy who created the first Middle Book of a Trilogy Syndrome case. The idea is that the first book has to have an interesting beginning of a conflict and the last book has to have an exciting conclusion which leaves the second book with the boring job of building a bridge between the two.
The Two Towers clearly shows this. I also do believe that the second part about Frodo and Sam being miserable can be made much shorter without any loss. I have the impression that while Tolkien tried to show the tragedy of a war, he still glorifies battles if they are fought for the just cause.
Much later it was Glen Cook in his Black Company who showed that war is a really dirty business, no matter what side. The Return of the King. Once again the part about the misery of Frodo and Sam can be shortened, but not to the extent as in The Two Towers. It looks like the editors were asleep at their job as much at the time the book was written as they are now.
Did anybody else had the impression that Gandalf the White was more useless overall than Gandalf the Grey? Did you notice that Sauron never ever makes a personal appearance? Tolkien made an excellent job of creating a menacing bad guy without showing him even once. This was also probably the first time an extremely annoying trope was used: This one made an appearance countless times ever since and by now really overstayed its welcome.
The last line of the book is brilliant and is as a perfect ending as it could possibly be. I only found one other fantasy series which came close to this perfection: This part is shorter as it contains numerous appendices, notes, etc. Reading them actually gave me a headache. They do contain some minimalistic info about the further fates of surviving characters.
To make a long story short the mortal guys died with time. I also realized that Middle Earth is not a nice place to live as wars were raging non-stop through its long history. In the conclusion I have a seemingly unrelated advice to my American friends. Do you have a tough choice in November between voting for a really bad person and an equally bad person? I will make it easy for you: View all 38 comments. Mar 20, Michael Finocchiaro rated it it was amazing Shelves: One of the greatest trilogies of all time and certainly the measuring stick to which all subsequent fantasy-style writing is compared, The Lord of the Rings trilogy still stands at the top of the stack.
Its realism, the characters and monsters, the storyline, the epic battles, and the quest motif are all drawn with incredible care by Tolkien in his chef d'oeuvre. My favorite was The Two Towers but all three are absolutely stunning.
The Lord of the Rings by J.R.R. Tolkien
It has been a few decades since I read them so perhaps this year One of the greatest trilogies of all time and certainly the measuring stick to which all subsequent fantasy-style writing is compared, The Lord of the Rings trilogy still stands at the top of the stack. It has been a few decades since I read them so perhaps this year I will have to journey back to Middle Earth once again. View all 14 comments.
The story began as a sequel to Tolkien's fantasy novel The Hobbit, but eventually developed into a much larger work.
The Lord of the Rings
Written in stages between and , The Lord of the Rings is one of the best-selling novels ever written, with over million copies sold. The title of the novel refers to t The title of the novel refers to the story's main antagonist, the Dark Lord Sauron, who had in an earlier age created the One Ring to rule the other Rings of Power as the ultimate weapon in his campaign to conquer and rule all of Middle-earth.
Nineteen of these rings were made. These were grouped into three rings for the Elves, seven rings for the Dwarves, and nine rings for men. From quiet beginnings in the Shire, a hobbit land not unlike the English countryside, the story ranges across Middle-earth, following the course of the War of the Ring through the eyes of its characters, not only the hobbits Frodo Baggins, Samwise "Sam" Gamgee, Meriadoc "Merry" Brandybuck and Peregrin "Pippin" Took, but also the hobbits' chief allies and travelling companions: View all 4 comments.
I will write three separate reviews and combine them here as I think all three books cover so much that I need to put my thoughts down. So here is my review-within-a-review for The Fellowship of the Ring: I read this the first time as a young teen but really didn't appreciate it much.
I came to know about Hobbits through school mates who kept talking abpout the then upcoming first movie by Peter Jackson. I went to watch it but was unimpressed, almost bored even until the last quarter at least.
I loved the mythology but little else. Nevertheless, I got the book and went to the trouble of finding and buying a special edition which was not easy back then. I read it but most went over my head.
Today I want to spank myself and not in a good way for ever thinking like that. Because if you know the book, and maybe The Hobbit as well, you can see just how much of a fan Peter Jackson is. Sooo many details only insiders will recognize. And the book is a thing to behold.
But I'm getting ahead of myself. This first part introduces us to the world of Middle-Earth Arda. There, elves, trolls, hobbits, goblins, orks, giant eagles and wolves, but also more sinister things dwell. And wizards, though I think that name is misleading here.
Great evil has this world seen in the past and while it was defeated, it is on the rise again as these things are wont to do. Sauron is the name of the great evil here and a long time ago he forged a ring of power to bind all other rings as well as people of Middle-Earth.
And just like a certain dark wizard of a more modern tale, he poured his soul into this master ring so it didn't matter when his body got destroyed thousands of years before the events of this first book.
But this ring has been found now - by one of the most innocent creatures in this world, of all things. The alliance that failed to vanquish evil from the world thousands of years ago is now represented in the titular fellowship comprising of a dwarf, an elf, two men, a wizard and four hobbits.
And they march to destroy the ring - and thus evil - before Sauron can restore himself to his full power again. Their quest leads them through forests, over mountains, on streams and through mines. But that is not the most important part, actually. Most important is the fact that Tolkien was a wordsmith.
He was not only a scholar at one of THE most famous universities in the world; he was not only fluent in several languages; he was not only keen on any mythology you can think of. He combined all of that in his writing.
Apparently, he didn't write it to get published, thinking nobody would be interested, and thus wrote to his heart's content. He included songs and poems, stating more than once that true magic lies in both as is represented by the elves for example. His nature descriptions are not only sweeping and vivid, but also utterly beautiful.
His dialogues, while being quite wordy, are fluent and artistic. Linguists have marvelled over Tolkien's affinity and mastery for generations and I feel the same. Many authors use made-up languages but not a single one of them actually sat down and drew up one as whole as Tolkien did. Thus, Tolkien has truly created an entire world, complete with art, history, mythology, geography look at those gorgeous maps , politics, different peoples, languages The only thing he didn't manage to convey as wonderfully as Peter Jackson with his films was the action.
At least not here in the first book. It is suspenseful, but the impact of the encounter with the Balrog for example was much more touching and shocking in the movie at least to me. The same goes for Arwen and Frodo being chased by the Black Riders until they cross the stream around Rivendell.
Maybe it's because he was fed up with war he fought in WW1 or maybe he wanted to hold back and then hit the reader with full force in the end battle. Or he just didn't have the same concept of action as most of us do nowadays. I'm not quite sure. Nevertheless, one feels the pathos look up the original word and its meaning , one believes the characters when they act out of integrity and honour and never once thinks it's pretentious of them again, the Boromir-scene in the movie makes me cry, the one in the book didn't.
I've re-watched the extended version of the first movie and I've noticed sooo many details I had missed before, it was astonishing. Here is my review-within-a-review for The Two Towers: This second book had fewer songs and poems and yes, I missed them. In this second part of the trilogy, the fellowship has broken up.
Aragorn, Gimli and Legolas are persuing the Uruk'hai and orks that have taken Merry and Pippin while Frodo and Sam are trying to find their way to Mordor. Whether or not that is a good idea remains to be seen. Moreover, Saruman is showing his true multi colours and thus sends an army to destroy Rohan and its inhabitants.
But he didn't count on Merry and Pippin making some new friends in Fangorn forest and then there are also the Rohirrim, the formidable cavalry of the horse lords. This second volume certainly saw more action. However, much like in the first book, many of those scenes were handled slightly better in the movie I shall re-watch the second one tomorrow or the day after. What the book has that the movie simply couldn't have, is a certain depth.
All the history of the last big battle against Sauron and what happened to the alliance of elves and men back then, the people of the south and their tendency to immediately follow Sauron, the proud but hopeless people of Gondor that we glimpse through Boromir's brother Faramir, However, Tolkien letting some characters tell of their experiences or their ancestors' experiences was a brilliant way of including the history of Middle-Earth that has passed into legends.
And since every creature experiences history differently, we get a multi-faceted look through different eyes of different corners of the world. Most interesting to me were the Ents.
Not just Treebeard but the others, too, especially the mysterious loss of the Ent-Wives. There are one or two possibilities what Treebeard means when he says "we lost them" and it was fun for me as a reader to dwell on what the most likely story was. Not to mention that I love trees and everything green and the message of the Ents' struggle through time is clear enough especially nowadays what with the even more apparent results of climate change.
However, it was also extremely satisfying to see them fighting back and kicking ass. Nevertheless, here, too, there was a scene I preferred in the movie as that one conveyed an additional message seen throughout Peter Jackson's trilogy: We are seeing it with the elves and the tree shepherds aren't any different.
As I mentioned in the beginning of this mini-review, this second volume had a bit less of Tolkien's wordshmithery, his awesome poems and songs. Instead, we got more fast-paced action sequences that were also slightly better done than the ones in the first book. But never fear, the writing style is still gorgeous and the descriptions astonishingly vivid and colourful, opening up distant corners we hadn't been to yet and introducing even weirder creatures of Middle-Earth than we've seen so far.
So here is my review-within-a-review for The Return of the King: The conclusion of the trilogy has us follow Gimli, Legolas and Aragorn as they lead the realms of men against the Army of Darkness while we also still follow Sam and Frodo yes, surprise, he's not dead after all ;P on their way to Mount Doom to destroy the One Ring. As such, we see Saruman imprisoned by Treebeard and his Ents, we learn of and see in action the Army of the Dead, we still shudder because of a certain giant spider, fret over Boromir's little brother and we wait for Gollum to make a comeback to get is prrrrrreciouzzzzzz.
Most of all, though, we see a massive clash of forces and have the privilege of seeing some truly delightful characters beat the living shit out of the bad guys Eowyn, anyone? In the end, we get to say goodbye to all these lovely creatures we've journeyed together with, that we've laughed and cried with, whom we care about and kept our fingers crossed for.
For, sadly, the age of magic is over and the age of man is upon us. And no, I don't like it one bit. Tolkien ramped up the action for this one the most. The satisfying conclusion to all the build-up and while I still think that the movie managed to make me gasp more, he turned out to be wonderfully skilled in describing honourable sacrifices as much as impressive sword fights. My favourite is, of course, Eowyn taking out the Witch-King of Angmar.
Granted, that, too, was done better in the movie view spoiler [there, though she did take Merry into battle with her, she fought him alone and therefore also stood victorious alone hide spoiler ] , just like the succession of Rohan's rulers was better in the movie.
While I always try to factor in the time any given book was written in and the environment in which the respective author grew up in, I know from other material, material written before LOTR, that Tolkien could do better female characters so Eowyn and Arwen felt like a waste especially when compared with how wonderfully Peter Jackson had done them.
Still, it's not exactly awful - you could say this is nitpicking on the highest level. One of the most amazing things is that I really got the impression of having been on a journey for a year or more with these people, so much has happened and so realistically did Tolkien portray the events as much as the sceneries.
Moreover, here, we had more songs and poems again and the magic they envoked was palpable for me as a reader once more. The heaviness of the Mordor chapters was immediately lifted when Sam would start up a tune or a rhyme so Tolkien was right about the magic.
We all know that this story isn't about Frodo. On the surface some might presume so, but they'd be utterly wrong. Anyone can see clear as day that it's Sam's story. But for those who needed a moment longer, I shall simply quote the author and indeed the character himself: I shall re-watch this last movie, too, of course and am already looking forward to discovering yet more details I couldn't know about the very first time I saw the movie. I already learned a bit of trivia that astonished me like the fact that I discovered only now that Aunt Zelda of the new Sabrina series is Eowyn!
You see: This concludes a re-read of epic proportions and I'm glad I let myself be persuaded to do it as I had indeed forgotten most of what made the books be different and I have to still shamefacedly admit that my much younger self absolutely did not appreciate the richness portrayed in the author's linguistic craftmanship as much as I should have back then.
I've re-watched the last movie today and have to point out once again how much I love that Peter Jackson makes Faramir give up whatever position he might have gotten in Gondor in favour of following his wife because SHE is a ruler.
Just like I love that Theoden came up with the idea of making Eowyn his heir and no Eomer in between, simply because she was the right choice. Yes, I was a geeky child. However, all these years later, the story has stuck with me.
First a warning: Don't read Tolkien if you don't appreciate true-omnicient-narrator-style epics. Tolkien isn't a master character builder: As with many of the themes in this work, the romance and deep character relationships must be picked from between the lines. And there is so much between the lines here. The world of Middle-earth lives, utterly lives. Instead of tugging on what-ifs, this fantasy forces readers to imagine.
Tolkien's work is the fullest realization of literary world building ever penned. It is also sophisticated writing, drawing on older forms epic, romance, tragedy. Tolkien doesn't waste time writing snappy dialogue: However, voice shifts subtly depending on point of view: These shifts in style, far from being a novice writer's oops, are intentional and serve as mass characterisation of races and groups.
So, what Tolkien foregoes in terms of dialogue he replaces with style and action: Having just spouted all that praise, I have to admit that all the criticisms are true: The thing to remember is that this book started the genre: So, no, it isn't a popcorn read.
Get over it. If you invest the time and spirit to read this work, you will be glad you did. View all 6 comments.
People who like walking and indecipherable poetry. Save time This book can appeal only to a linguist. The underlying story is great, but it is buried under an avalance of horribly annoying songs and poems that do nothing to advance the story.
They just take up space. I diligently read every last one, hoping that they held some deep meaning in relation to the story, but if there is one, it is so obscure that it serves no purpose.